Posts Tagged ‘Politics’

Climate Leadership from Within

December 23rd, 2009

The International Climate Summit in Copenhagen is over and, regrettably, no binding deal was made.  For a laugh, I highly recommend this little gem of a summary on what transpired in Copenhagen.

One of the better perspectives I have read on the negotiations is from Vancouver urban planner Stephen Rees who reminds us that we should not wait for politicians to make changes.  Climate leadership can come from cities; after all, 85% of Canada’s population lives in a city.  This was one of the points I was hoping to make with this panel discussion.  If you live in Vancouver, the best action you can take is to encourage and support the commitment that Vancouver has made to be the greenest city in the world.  And if you live in some other city, then let them know what Vancouver is doing and challenge your mayor and council to take us on.  As Andrea Reimer said in the panel discussion: “we’d be happy to get the pants beat off us if somebody was trying to be even greener.”

>> Click here to watch the 45 minute panel discussion




Radio Interview

November 4th, 2009

About a month ago I was interviewed by Adam Sterling from CFAX 1070 in Victoria regarding the carbon neutral universities report I wrote.  This and other media inquiries we have received are all interested in one thing: the lack of funding identified by many of the institutions  – a particularly relevant concern given the recent provincial budget.  The question now is: will the province’’s Climate Action Plan be stalled by a tight economy and severe budget cuts?

Here is the interview

Taking Action: BC’s Universities and Colleges Begin to Become Carbon Neutral

June 22nd, 2009

TakingActionNear the end of 2007 the BC government enacted the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Targets Act which put into law the greenhouse gas reduction commitments made in the province’s Climate Action Plan.  Specifically, the province is now legally committed to reducing greenhouse gas emissions:  6% below 2007 emission levels by 2012, 18% by 2016, 33% by 2020, and 80% by 2050.

The Act also requires that all of BC’s public sector organizations be carbon neutral by 2010 – this includes school districts, post-secondary institutions, and hospitals.  Specifically: by the end of 2010, all public sector organizations must have greenhouse gas auditing systems in place and must purchase carbon offsets for their emissions.  In addition, it is expected that public sector organizations will find ways to reduce their total emissions over time.

“I think the offset obligation is definitely something universities have to deal with but it’s not going to be the biggest challenge. I think the biggest challenge is going to be where they try to push their emissions down over time.  We are going to want to keep seeing reductions down the road.”  – Government respondent

This new policy direction will have profound impacts on how colleges and universities operate.

This study was undertaken to find out how post secondary institutions were responding: what actions they have taken and what challenges they are facing.

The primary focus for implementing the Act is on energy management because this represents the largest opportunity to reduce greenhouse gas emissions; but we must remember that climate change is not just about more efficient light bulbs and fewer parking lots, it is about breaking down traditional barriers and disciplinary thinking, it is about new ways of relating to the environment and each other and about reassessing what we value.  Catalyzing these essential cultural changes is where post secondary can make the largest contribution since it is here that each new generation of leaders are trained.  BC’s colleges and universities recognize that they play a critical role in this process and they are all committed to climate action.

Carbon neutrality is not the ultimate goal, but it is a first step which has the capacity to transform higher education in British Columbia which will in turn have profound cultural effects.  Ultimately, this is a grand experiment and people are watching.  What we do here will have an impact globally.

This is a project of the BC Working Group on Sustainability Education, also known as WalkingtheTalk.bc.ca.  Many thank-yous to Janet Moore, professor at the SFU Centre for Dialogue and the driving force behind Walking the Talk, for giving this project life.

Click here to read the full report.

The International Assembly – a new concept for international relations

March 14th, 2008

On a recent final exam, I was asked the following question:

Assume that you have the power to change the manner in which nations deal with one another. Assume that the United Nations has hired you to propose a new order of international co-operation to reform “world governance” in all areas of international law and diplomacy. Assume that existing concepts of sovereignty and immunity do not exist.

Here is my answer. I would love to hear your thoughts.

» More: The International Assembly – a new concept for international relations

An Analysis of Housing Policy in Canada & the Vancouver Affordable Housing Crisis

November 19th, 2007

“Homelessness is characterized as the most extreme manifestation of poverty, social exclusion, and marginalization.” (Wynne-Edwards 1998) [i]

Vancouver, like many other Canadian cities, is experiencing a housing crisis. In 2005, there were 2174 homeless, almost double that of 1121 in 2002[ii], and the homeless population is expected to increase to over 3000 by 2010[iii]. A full half of those without a home are living on the street and one third of those without a home have been homeless for a year or more. According to the 2001 Census, 125,000 people in the GVRD are at risk of homelessness[iv]. It is estimated that an additional 3200 units of supportive housing are needed to meet the needs of the homeless or those at risk of homelessness[v] yet the creation of new Social Housing units (including SROs, non-profit housing, cooperatives and subsidized housing) has virtually ceased since 1994[vi].

These numbers suggest a more systemic problem of decreasing access to affordable housing. Affordable housing is defined by the Canadian Mortgage and Housing Corporation as that which costs less than 30% of a household’s gross income. If total housing costs (mortgage payments, interest, insurance, tax, utilities, rent, etc.) equal greater than 30% of a household’s total gross income, then housing is considered to be unaffordable and the household is considered to be in core housing need. The 2001 Census found that in Vancouver one in five was in core housing need and renters were much more likely to fall into core need than owners[vii]. As of 2006, the rental vacancy rate in Vancouver was 0.7%. 3% to 5% is considered healthy[viii]. To purchase an average single family house in the GVRD requires a total household income of $121,921 in order for mortgage payments to be considered affordable yet the average household income is only $42,624[ix]. While the creation of more social housing units and emergency shelters would alleviate short-term problems, any long-term policy solution must address the bigger problem of decreasing affordable housing stock across the entire housing spectrum from private ownership, to rental, to non-market housing. This paper will provide an overview of the current and historical housing policy framework, examine the social and economic context within which such policies must operate, and evaluate current proposals to address the issue.

» More: An Analysis of Housing Policy in Canada & the Vancouver Affordable Housing Crisis